Login

Poll of the Day

What is the worst omission from the Judgement Day card? (15 votes)

  • 53%

    William Regal/Mr. Kennedy

  • 7%

    Rhodes/Holly vs. Santino/Carlito

  • 20%

    Mark Henry/Big Show

  • 20%

    Victoria/Natalya vs. Michelle McCool/Cherry

Login or Join To Vote

Poll closes on 5/18/08 8:00 PM

Rate MSG Classics

Hulk Hogan Hulk Hogan. Roddy Piper. Jimmy Snuka. Many WWE Legends have fought in the hallowed halls of Madison Square Garden. MSG Classics has returned to TV, and you can rate the matches of yesterday today on wrestlingmarks.com. Rate MSG Classics.

Rate All Matches

And keep checking back, because new and classic shows from all promotions are added each day.

Top 10

Edge On Smackdown, Edge lived up to his "Ultimate Opportunist" nickname and won a title shot for Judgement Day. Where would he land on the Top 10? Check out the Top 10.

Learn more about the Top 10 in our new YouTube video.

Top Bloggers Giveaway

Wrestling DVDsLike to write about wrestling? wrestlingmarks is the place to do it, as each month we give away a free DVD to the member deemed the top blogger by our community. Commentaries, show reviews, fantasy booking, whatever you want to write about, WRITE IT, and you could win a DVD! Learn more about the Top Bloggers contest.

wrestlingmarks poll

Why aren't you ordering Sacrifice? (13 votes)

  • 38%

    Cause I don't really care about TNA.

  • 31%

    Because the card is absurd.

  • 8%

    Just skipping this one, will possibly order the next one.

  • 23%

    I AM ordering Sacrifice, in fact.

This poll is closed.

Comments

(11 total)

From jeff on 5/10/08 2:26 AM

This might be the worst pay-per-view of the year. I thought that nothing could get worst then Against All Odds.

From JamesP on 5/10/08 8:41 AM

How come there's no option for, "I like the card but just on't feel like ordering it."?

From theone86 on 5/10/08 8:14 PM

This poll is proof that there are a bunch of TNA haters on this site. Saying you're not going to order this PPV because there are too many gimmick matches is like saying you're not going to order Survivor Series because there are too many stipulation matches. Every time TNA books a gimmick match everyone gets up in arms and starts trashing them.

The deuces wild is a cool concept where you're probably going to get a Beniot/Angle-esque Championship team out of it.

The Knockouts match is just a battle royal that ends in a ladder match. TNA has done plenty of matches that start out as a certain kind of match for one fall and then turn into another, and most of them have been pretty damn good.

The triple threat has a cool build, and I can't wait to see Steiner get into the mix of this fued. It's a better decision than to just have Angle and Joe go at it in YET ANOTHER one on one match.

The only questionable part about this card is the terrordome, and you can't say it's going to be a bad concept without seeing one first. Personally, I think it's a MUCH better concept than Elevation X, and I could see this being a fairly cool match.

As for Against All Odds, what was bad about that PPV? It had great matches all the way down the card. The only thing you could possibly have a problem with is the EY match, and even that was done pretty well. It's fine if you just don't like TNA, but no one's ever going to take you seriously if all you do is come out here and try to badmouth everything they ever do.

From jeff on 5/10/08 8:23 PM

I watch TNA every week so I don't hate TNA at all. The problem with Against All Odds was every match except the 6 man Hardcore match and the Angle/Christian Cage match was bad. Its not that every match is a gimmick match it's just that their are too many matches meaning that every match will be rushed. The only match I would only want to see is the triple threat match. If their wasn't so many matches I would probably feel different, but I know every match is going to be rushed. Like I said I don't hate TNA because I watch it every week. I actually enjoyed Lockdown last month which was better than Backlash.

From bpapa on 5/11/08 12:31 AM

There probably wouldn't be very many TNA haters on this site if TNA didn't suck so badly.

From jeff on 5/11/08 12:49 AM

And theone86 I don't know what the hell you're talking about I don't always badmouth TNA. I praised TNA for their last pay-per-view Lockdown. And do you think I really give a damn if you don't take me seriously for my opinions. No I don't. These are my opinions so weather you like them or not I really don't care. TNA Sacrifice in my opinion sounds bad therefore I'm not ordering it.

From JamesP on 5/11/08 1:33 AM

Same goes for WWE too, bpapa. If you could say TNA sucks, then you certaintly couldn't say that WWE was the best promotion of 2007 because WWE was a boring, steaming pile of SHIT in 2007 with the most overrated wrestler of all time dominating the year in matches where you could see the outcome from the other side of the universe. Just saying...

From JamesP on 5/11/08 1:37 AM

And you're doing exactly what he's talking about. It's cool not to like it, but to bash it every chance you get? I remember in one blog, someone said that WWE needs to stop having clear cut faces and heels, and said that was one thing he liked about TNA, and for no reason at all, you said that TNA doesn't have clear-cut faces because they don't know what they're doing. Just lay off and give them a chance. At least I *try* to give WWE a chance when they truly start to suck.

From jeff on 5/11/08 2:30 AM

What the hell are you talking about? I never said that at all. If you can show me the blog where I said it then fine, but I know I didn't say anything like that at all. JamesP if you're not talking to me then I apologize, but if you are then get your facts right.

From JamesP on 5/11/08 8:19 AM

I was talking to bpapa.

From Petedaddydolla on 5/11/08 9:39 AM

This gives me a good idea for a blog...just for the record I am going to WATCH Sacrifice, but not order it.

Login or Join To Post a Comment